{"id":53,"date":"2026-01-22T12:09:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T11:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.unica.it\/6euroxphi\/?page_id=53"},"modified":"2026-07-09T09:29:01","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T07:29:01","slug":"programme","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sites.unica.it\/6euroxphi\/","title":{"rendered":"Programme"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Programme<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

University of Cagliari<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Faculty of Humanistic Studies<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Department of Education, Psychology, Philosophy <\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

6th<\/sup> European Experimental Philosophy Conference<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

&<\/strong>
Linguistic Justice Society Satellite Workshop on \u201cInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Linguistic Justice\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

September 8\u201311, 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Generously supported by <\/strong>
Gian Pietro Storari Funds,<\/strong> Dipartimento di Pedagogia, Psicologia, Filosofia, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Cagliari, <\/strong>
Fondazione di Sardegna, Esperantic Studies Foundation, Regione Autonoma Sardegna<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
Linguistic Justice Society Satellite Workshop<\/strong> – September 8<\/strong><\/summary>\n

8:30\u20138:45<\/strong> Registration, Room 2B<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8:45\u20139:00<\/strong> Welcome, Room 1B<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair: Filippo Contesi (Cagliari)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:00\u20139:45<\/strong> Invited Talk: \u00c7a\u011fla \u00c7imendereli (Old Dominion), The Concept of Nonnative Speaker<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:45\u201310:15<\/strong> Giuseppina Calenda, Linguistic Injustice in Italian L2 Classrooms: Rethinking Inclusion and Epistemic Agency<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

10:15\u201310:45<\/strong> Saiki Lucy Cheah (Helsinki), Language, Access, and Agency: Linguistic Justice in Environmental Citizenship Education<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

10:45\u201311:15<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair: TBD<\/p>\n\n\n\n

11:15\u201311:45<\/strong> David Bordonaba-Plou (Madrid Complutense) & Laila M. Jreis-Navarro (Zaragoza), Linguistic Injustice in Multilingual Technologies: The Paradox of Anglocentric Multilingualism<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

11:45\u201312:15<\/strong> Denisa Reshef Kera (Bar Ilan), Deixis Across Languages: Ethical Dilemma Simulations and Normative Reasoning in Multilingual LLMs<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

12:15\u201312:45<\/strong> Kelly Dinneen, Do AI Translation Technologies Serve Linguistic Justice for Animals?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

12:45\u201314:05<\/strong> Lunch Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair: TBD<\/p>\n\n\n\n

14:05\u201315:00<\/strong> Keynote Talk: Masaharu Mizumoto (Japan Advanced Institute of Science & Technology), AI Cross-Linguistic Inconsistency: Should We Defer to or Disagree With?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

15:00\u201315:30<\/strong> Maya Alkateb-Chami (Harvard), Advancing a Right to a Basic Literacy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

15:30\u201316:00<\/strong> Anna Dro\u017cd\u017cowicz (Inland Norway), Linguistic Diversity and Ambivalence<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

16:00\u201316:30<\/strong> Diana Camps (Glasgow), Framing in(Justice): Language, Law and Social Rights<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

16:30\u201317:00<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair: Francesca Ervas (Cagliari)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

17:00\u201317:30<\/strong> Bengt-Arne Wickstr\u00f6m (Budapest Andr\u00e1ssy), Language Rights and Justice for Linguistic Minorities From the Perspective of Constitutional Economics<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

17:30\u201318:00<\/strong> Zezheng Lin (Chicago), Quantifying Linguistic Injustice in Multilingual Foundation Model Evaluation: The Translation Tax<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

18:00\u201318:30<\/strong> Laura Paige Fitzgerald (San Diego State), More than Mechanics: Linguistic Discrimination in AI Grading Tools<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

18:30\u201319:00<\/strong> Neri Marsili (Turin), Linguistic Inequity in Academic Philosophy: A Big Data Analysis of Publication Trends (1975<\/em>\u20132021)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference – Day 1 – September 9<\/strong><\/summary>\n


8:30\u20139:00<\/strong> Registration, Room 2B<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:00\u20139:15 <\/strong>Introduction, Room 1B<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chair: Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman (Adam Mickiewicz Poznan)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:15\u201310:00<\/strong> Keynote Talk: Francesca Panzeri (Milan Bicocca), It\u2019s a Bitter-Sweet Irony: Understanding Ironic Compliments<\/em>
10:00\u201310:20<\/strong> Discussion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

10:20\u201310:50<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>X-Phi Methodology<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Language<\/strong><\/td>Moral X-Phi<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Chair<\/td>TBD<\/td>Elisabetta Gola
(Cagliari)<\/td>		TBD<\/td><\/tr>
10:50\u201311:30<\/strong><\/td>Ivar Rodriguez Hannikainen (Granada), Joshua Knobe (Yale), Philosophical Thought Experiments Elicit Conflicting Intuitions<\/em><\/td>Jenny Jones (Edinburgh), A Linguistic Investigation of Gendered Autonomy<\/em><\/td>Niels Skovgaard-Olsen (Freiburg), Norm Conflicts and Decision Theory<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
11:30\u201312:10<\/strong><\/td>James Andow (Manchester), What are the Implications of the Conflicting Intuitions Hypothesis?<\/em><\/td>Lucien Baumgartner (Zurich), Contextual Evaluative Asymmetries in Thick Predicates<\/em><\/td>Scott Partington (Cambridge), Shaun Nichols (Cornell), The Cultural Evolution of Specified Norms<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
12:10\u201312:50<\/strong><\/td>Adrian Zi\u00f3\u0142kowski, Krzysztof S\u0119kowski (Warsaw), Even More Stable Conflicting Intuitions: The Retraction Effect<\/em>  <\/em><\/td>Pawel Lupkowski (Adam Mickiewicz Poznan), Erotetic Search Scenarios as a<\/em> Normative Questioning Agenda for Information-Seeking Dialogues<\/em><\/td>Aidan Runagall-McNaull (Oxford), Putting the Moral Cart Before the Structural Horse: Moralised Attitudes Aren\u2019t Strong, but Strong Attitudes are Moralised<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

12:50\u201314:30<\/strong> Lunch<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>X-Phi of Language<\/strong><\/td>X-Epistemology<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Medicine<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Chair<\/td>Filippo Contesi (Cagliari)<\/td>Francesca Ervas (Cagliari)<\/td>TBD<\/td><\/tr>
14:30\u201315:10<\/strong><\/td>Alex Wiegmann (Bochum), Nikolai Shurakov (Zurich), Pascale Willemsen (Zurich), Lying by Omission<\/em><\/td>Piotr Bystranowski (Jagiellonian  Krakow), Is Ignorance About Being Ignorant: A Study Across Varieties of Ignorance<\/em><\/td>Ivars Neiders (Latvia), Vilius Dranseika (Jagiellonian Krakow), Prediction Tools for Severe Mental Disorders: Acceptability of Transparent vs. Opaque Models<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
15:10\u201315:50<\/strong><\/td>Svea Reinken, Mailin Antomo (G\u00f6ttingen), Emanuel Viebahn (Hamburg), Seeing Lies. Lying and Commitment Through Visual Communication<\/em><\/td>Samuel Schindler (Aarhus), Scientific Discovery and Potential Bias<\/em>  <\/td>Vilius Dranseika (Jagiellonian Krakow), Losing a Part of Oneself, One\u2019s World Being Destroyed, and No Longer Being the Same Person: Grief Utterances and Personal Identity<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
15:50\u201316:30<\/strong><\/td>Mikl\u00f3s K\u00fcrthy, Markus Kneer (Graz), The Concept of Fake News: The Roles of Falsity, Deception, and Politics<\/em>  <\/td>Mariusz Urbanski, R\u00f3\u017ca Sateja (Adam Mickiewicz Poznan), Does the Moon Go Round? Cross-Cultural Evidence for Circular-Model Reasoning<\/em><\/td>Paola Pennisi, Sara Alfia Nicotra, Michela Cannarozzo (Messina), Pragmatic Competence Beyond Language: Clinical Evidence From Jordan Syndrome<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

16:30\u201317:00<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Moral X-Phi<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi Methodology<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Language<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Chair<\/td>TBD<\/td>TBD<\/td>TBD<\/td><\/tr>
17:00\u201317:40<\/strong><\/td>Charlotte Phillips, Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford), Respecting the Dead: Relationship, Time, and the Moral Psychology of Obligations to the Dead<\/em><\/td>Marcus Ashby (King\u2019s College London), Do We Have \u2018Revelation\u2019 Intuitions? Experimental Philosophy and Phenomenal Essence<\/em><\/td>Nicole Gotzner (Osnabr\u00fcck), Kevin Reuter (Gothenburg), Does Discrimination Require Intent?<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
17:40\u201318:20<\/strong><\/td>Dariusz Mi\u0119kisz (Jagiellonian Krakow), The Action-First Deep Self: Experimental Evidence from Inverse Akrasia and Inverse Enkrasia<\/em><\/td>Katarzyna Ku\u015b, Bartosz Ma\u0107kiewicz, Joanna G\u0119gotek, Monika Gurak, Franciszek Kittel (Warsaw), Something at Stake in Knowledge After All? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence<\/em><\/td>Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman (Adam Mickiewicz Poznan), Is Irony Hard to Understand, or Just Rare? Exposure Frequency and Irony Comprehension in Bilinguals<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
18:20\u201319:00<\/strong><\/td>Katarzyna Zy\u0144 (Warsaw), Moral Granularity as an Unrecognised Confound in Folk Metaethics. A Methodological Proposal<\/em><\/td>Paul Rehren (Max Planck), Is Experimental Philosophy\u2019s Moment in the Sun Over? A Scientometric Analysis<\/em><\/td>Lucienne Huby (Cagliari), Oriana Mosca (Cagliari), Valentina Rizzoli (Sapienza Rome), Beyond Comprehension: A Memory-Based Account of Metaphor and Epistemic Injustice in Mental Health Contexts<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference – Day 2 – September 10<\/strong><\/summary>\n

Chair: Pascale Willemsen (Zurich)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:15\u201310:00<\/strong> Keynote Talk, Room 1B: Shaun Nichols (Cornell Ithaca), Teleology and the Meaning of Life<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

10:00\u201310:20<\/strong> Discussion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

10:20\u201310:50<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
 <\/td>Moral X-Phi<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of AI<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Language<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Chair<\/td>Roberta Fadda (Cagliari)<\/td>TBD<\/td>Francesca Ervas (Cagliari)<\/td><\/tr>
10:50\u201311:30<\/strong><\/td>Faisal Feroz, Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford), Deconstructing the Moral Circle: Distinguishing Standing, Obligation, and Concern<\/em><\/td>Maximilian Theisen (Basel), Should the machine know better? Asymmetric Epistemic Standards Toward Human and Artificial Agents<\/em><\/td>Paul E. Engelhardt, Dimitra Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, Mohammed S. Houssaini, Eugen Fischer (East Anglia), Diversity in Polysemy Processing: Empirical Constraints on Conceptual Re-engineering<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
11:30\u201312:10<\/strong><\/td>Kiichi Inarimori (Hiroshima), Moral Responsibility in a Sense and in a Deeper Sense: Rethinking Compatibilist and Incompatibilist Responses in Experimental Philosophy<\/em><\/td>Ritsaart Reimann (Graz), In the Loop, Out of Sync: Moral Judgement in Human-AI Control Architectures<\/em><\/td>Elisa Franchetti, Dan Lassiter (Edinburgh), When Do Presuppositions Outperform Assertions? The Role of Vigilance and Trigger Type in Persuasive Effect of Presupposed Content<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
12:10\u201312:50<\/strong><\/td>Tiago Carneiro da Silva (Leeds), Experimental Ethics and Self-Evidence<\/em><\/td>Neele Engelmann, Lara Kirfel, Anne-Marie Nussberger, Raluca Rilla, JF Bonnefon, Iyad Rahwan (Max Planck), Hey ChatGPT, Lie for Me! Delegating Unethical Behavior to AI<\/em><\/td>Agata Paszke, Sebastian Ko\u0142odziejczyk, Joseph Ulatowski (Jagiellonian Krakow), Proper Names, Individuation, and the Modified Test of Metaphysical Intuitions<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

12:50\u201314:30<\/strong> Lunch<\/p>\n\n\n\n

14:30\u201315:30 Poster Presentations, Room 2B<\/strong><\/em><\/summary>\n
    \n
  • Lucienne Huby (Cagliari), Declarative Memory and Metaphor Production: A Behavioral Pilot Study on Emotional Episodic Recall and Semantic Network Structure<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Izabela Dorota Skoczen, Jakub Figura (Jagiellonian Krakow), How LLMs Spread Misinformation Through Implicatures<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Friederike Moltmann (CNRS, Paris), On the Connection Between Philosophical and Linguistic Intuition<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Vivyen Sagsen (York), Imagination as a Cognitive Lab<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n
     <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
     <\/td>X-Phi of Language<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Law<\/strong><\/td>Moral X-Phi<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
    Chair<\/td>TBD<\/td>TBD<\/em>  <\/td>TBD<\/td><\/tr>
    16:00\u201316:40<\/strong><\/td>Riin K\u00f5iv (Barcelona), Does Linking Language Matter? Genetic Essentialism and the Context Sensitivity of Interpretation<\/em><\/td>Karolina Prochownik (Jagiellonian Krakow), Conceptual Analysis in Traditional and Experimental Jurisprudence: Continuity or Transformation?<\/em><\/td>Pascale Willemsen (Zurich), Alexander Max Bauer (Oldenburg), When the Apple Doesn\u2019t Fall From the Tree\u2026 Nobody Blames the Tree!<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    16:40\u201317:20<\/strong><\/td>Maciej Tarnowski, Adrian Zi\u00f3\u0142kowski (Warsaw), Putting KK to the Test<\/em><\/td>Leonard Hoeft (HU Berlin), Guilherme Almeida (Insper Sao Paulo), Ivar Hannikainen (Granada), Piotr Bystranowski (Jagiellonian Krakow), Noel Struchiner (PUC-Rio), Crafting Rules<\/em> \u00a0<\/em><\/td>Christian Rodriguez (Basel), Kirsten Persson (Basel), David Shaw (Basel), Edwin Louis-Maerten (Basel), Samuel Camenzind (Vienna), Matthias Eggel (Basel), Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford), Welfare, Integrity, and Brain-Dead Animals: An Experimental Bioethics Study of Public Moral Judgements in Animal Research<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    17:20\u201318:00<\/strong><\/td>Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh), Moore’s Paradox Across Cultures<\/em><\/td>Noel Struchiner (PUC-Rio), Guilherme Almeida (Insper Sao Paulo), Karolina Prochownik (Jagiellonian Krakow), Who Protests Unjust Laws: Positivists or Their Critics? An Empirical Test of the Normative Case for Legal Positivism<\/em><\/td>Zezheng Lin (Chicago), Jinhao Gan (Beijing), When LLM Agents Look Like Survey Respondents. A Mechanism Non-Identification Problem for X-Phi Methodology<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    20:00<\/strong> Social Dinner<\/p>\n<\/details>\n\n\n\n

    6th European Experimental Philosophy Conference – Day 3 – September 11<\/strong><\/summary>\n

    Chair: Francesca Ervas (Cagliari)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    9:15\u201310:00<\/strong> Keynote Talk, Room 1B: Barbara Konat (Adam Mickiewicz Poznan), Emotion, Argument Strength, and Experimental Philosophy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    10:00\u201310:20<\/strong> Discussion<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    10:20-10:50<\/strong> Coffee Break<\/p>\n\n\n\n

     <\/td>Room 1B<\/td>Room 3B<\/td>Room 4B<\/td><\/tr>
     <\/td>X-Phi of Medicine<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of Reasoning<\/strong><\/td>X-Phi of AI<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
    Chair<\/td>TBD<\/td>TBD<\/td>TBD<\/td><\/tr>
    10:50\u201311:30<\/strong><\/td>Somogy Varga (Aarhus), Joshua Knobe (Yale), Normality and the Ordinary Concept of Disease<\/em>  <\/em><\/td>Revati Shivnekar, Piotr Bystranowski (Jagiellonian Krakow), Reasonableness Judgements Are Driven by the Choice and the Effort Taken<\/em><\/em><\/td>Lara Kirfel, Neele Engelmann, Arne Maas, Anne-Marie Nussberger, Jonathan Phillips (Max Planck), LLM-Generated Possibilities Increase Blame Attribution<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    11:30\u201312:10<\/strong><\/td>Sin\u00e9ad Cleary, Celine Kraitem, Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford), Too Emotional to Decide? Gender-emotion Stereotypes and Medical Paternalism<\/em><\/td>Izabela Dorota Skoczen, Kacper Poradzisz (Jagiellonian Krakow), What is Reasonable for Artificial Intelligence?<\/em>  <\/em><\/td>Amrit Nidhi, Do People Trust Efficient AI Less? Compute Budgets, Transparency, and Epistemic Trust in Machine Testimony<\/em><\/td><\/tr>
    12:10\u201312:50<\/strong><\/td>Federico Bina, Aidan Runagall-McNaull, Joanna Demaree-Cotton (Oxford), An Empirical Investigation of Folk Conceptions of Listening in Healthcare<\/em><\/td>James Beebe (Buffalo), Good Reasoners Aren\u2019t Fooled by Authentic Evidence Gettier Cases (Which May Also Be Skeptical Pressure Cases)<\/em><\/td>Neri Marsili (Turin), The Costs and Benefits of Hiding:<\/em> Anonymous Testimony in Online Spaces<\/em><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

    12:50\u201314:30<\/strong> Lunch<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    14:30\u201315:30 Poster Presentations, Room 2B<\/em><\/summary>\n